Jobs For Faculty Of Archaeology Graduates in Lebanon

Company Description <br> <br>Chehab Pharmacy, located in Basta Tahta, Beirut, is a trusted neighborhood pharmacy dedicated to meeting the healthcare needs of the community. We offer a comprehensive range of prescription medications, over-the-counter remedies, medical supplies, skincare, and wellness products. <br> <br> <br>Role Description <br> <br>This is a full-time, P.M shift for Pharmacist. The Pharmacist will be responsible for dispensing medications, verifying prescriptions, providing expert advice to customers on proper medication use, and maintaining accurate records. <br> <br> <br>Qualifications <br> <br>Proficiency in patient counseling, including advising on medication use, side effects, and interactions <br>Strong communication and interpersonal skills to provide exceptional customer service <br>Valid pharmacist license <br>Bachelor’s degree in Pharmacy

Safeguard Officer <br> <br>Location: Togo <br> <br>Role Overview: <br>We require a Safeguard Officer to manage the environmental and social impacts of our Transmission Line project, ensuring compliance with international funding and environmental guidelines. <br> <br>Key Responsibilities: <br> <br> Implement the Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP). <br> <br> Monitor environmental compliance, waste management, and social impact mitigation on-site. <br> <br> Liaise with local communities and stakeholders to resolve grievances. <br> <br> Prepare compliance reports for management and external regulatory bodies. <br> <br>Qualifications: <br> <br> Degree in Environmental Science, Sociology, or a related field. <br>5+ Years Exp. <br> Experience in environmental and social safeguarding for large construction projects. <br> <br> Familiarity with international environmental standards (e.g., World Bank/IFC guidelines). <br> <br>Submit your application directly through this job posting <br>or Email: Send your CV to careers@i-cc.co <br>or WhatsApp: Send your CV to +961 71224727

Environmental engineer work to design, develop, and implement solutions that address environmental challenges such as air and water pollution, waste management, and sustainability . <br>knowledge from biology, chemistry, ecology, geology, hydraulics, hydrology, microbiology, and mathematics to create systems that improve environmental quality and health <br>Key Responsibilities <br>• Water and Wastewater Management: Designing municipal water supply systems, industrial wastewater treatment, and sanitation plans to prevent waterborne diseases <br>• Pollution Control: Developing strategies to reduce air, water, and soil pollution from industrial and urban sources <br>• Waste Management and Recycling: Planning and managing the disposal, recycling, and treatment of hazardous and non-hazardous waste <br>• Environmental Compliance: Ensuring that construction projects and industrial operations comply with environmental laws and regulations <br>• Research and Education: Conducting studies on environmental impacts, sustainability, and emerging technologies, and educating the public or industry professionals <br>Qualifications and Career Path <br>needs a bachelor’s degree in environmental engineering or a related field such as civil or chemical engineering

<section><p class="heading jdMain">Job Description</p><p class="heading">Roles &amp; Responsibilities</p><div class="paragraph"><p>Communities hosting displaced populations face increasing pressure on limited resources, weakened service delivery systems, and reduced institutional capacities. These challenges have been further intensified by the economic and financial crisis since 2019, as well as the growing impacts of climate change. The Local Development for Stabilization Project (LDP) aims to bolster the coping and sustainable development capacities of host communities in Lebanon. Its key objectives are to create a more enabling environment for mitigating and preventing tensions by: • Reducing competition over public services, livelihood, and economic opportunities: This is achieved by supporting the maintenance and expansion ofservice delivery and creating economic opportunities, especially in the context of the significant incapacitation of both public and private sectors. • Providing conflict-sensitive and inclusive dialogue and decision-making spaces: These spaces allow local communities to engage in peaceful discussions, identify common interests, and collaboratively chart a path towards a sustainable future. • The Local Development for Stabilization Project (LDP) focuses on strengthening local governance, enhancing economic resilience, and supporting sustainable development processes at the community level. The LDP project is critical in addressing Lebanon s multi-dimensional vulnerabilities and ensuring the country s capacity forsustainable, inclusive recovery. It aimsto create a harmonious, integrated approach to local development that not only addresses immediate needs but also builds resilience for the future. Within this framework, infrastructure rehabilitation and civil works at community facilities remain a key intervention for improving service delivery and living conditions. Wadi Khaled Social Development Center is a key community facility serving the population of Wadi Khaled, North Lebanon. UNDP, under the LDP project, is undertaking civil rehabilitation and construction works at this center and requires a Civil Engineer Consultant to monitor, supervise, and ensure the quality of these civil works. OBJECTIVES The main objective of this consultancy is to provide dedicated technical expertise in civil engineering to support the supervision, monitoring, and quality assurance of civil works at the Wadi Khaled Social Development Center under the LDP project. Specifically, the Consultant will: • Ensure technical soundness and quality of civil works in compliance with approved designs and UNDP standards • Monitor contractor performance and ensure works are completed on time, within scope, and to specification • Review and validate contractor submittments including shop drawings, material submittals, and payment certificates, and provide technical solutions throughout the project lifecycle SCOPE OF WORK UNDP is seeking the services of a Civil Engineer Consultant to supervise the civil works being implemented at the Wadi Khaled Social Development Center, under the overall guidance of the LDP/LHSP Project Specialist and in close coordination with the Area Manager and the UNDP Engineering Unit. The Civil Engineer consultant shall be present on site four (4) days per week, according to an agreed schedule and in coordination with the UNDP Engineering Unit. Implementation and Supervision: • Supervise and inspect all civil and electromechanical works and materials/components supplied during the lifetime of the contract to ensure completion in accordance with contract provisions and QA/QC standards. • Propose solutions and update designs when required as per site conditions and encountered problems. Supervise all on-site tests carried out by the contractor related to civil, architectural and electromechanical works. • Participate in technical meetings with contractors and stakeholders when required. • Ensure that as-built drawings and all relevant documentation are well kept and regularly updated. • Process in a timely manner, and as appropriate, certify payment of contractor statements to ensure they reflect works performed. • Support UNDP in claims and variations. Document progress through daily/weekly/monthly field reports with geo-referenced photographic evidence. Participate in technical meetings with contractors and stakeholders when required. • Site inspection checklists and QA/QC protocols aligned with UNDP standards. • Field verification and validation approaches. • Reporting templates. • Use of geo-tagged photos and documentation STANDARD MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS Education • Bachelor s degree in Civil Engineering or related field. • Minimum of 8 years of experience in civil engineering, construction supervision, or infrastructure rehabilitation or any related field. Language: Fluency in Arabic and English is mandatory (both oral and written) The Personnel will be covered with Health insurance and Personal accident insurance; the fees shall be deducted from personnel's monthly payment.</p></div></section><section><p class="heading">Desired Candidate Profile</p><p class="paragraph"></p><p>• Bachelor s degree in Civil Engineering or related field.<br>• Minimum of 8 years of experience in civil engineering, construction supervision, or infrastructure rehabilitation or any related field.<br>Language: Fluency in Arabic and English is mandatory (both oral and written)</p><p></p></section>

<section><p class="heading jdMain">Job Description</p><p class="heading">Roles &amp; Responsibilities</p><div class="paragraph"><p><b><br></b></p><p><b>Key Responsibilities:</b></p><p>JOB POSITION: Regional HEA Senior Advisor</p><p>JOB PURPOSE: The Regional Humanitarian and Emergency Affairs (HEA) Senior Advisor provides strategic and technical leadership to strengthen disaster management across Middle East and Eastern Europe (MEER). Through technical advice, influence, coordination, deployment and remote support, this role helps Field Offices and regional leadership anticipate, prepare, and manage humanitarian responses that are context-relevant, timely and aligned with WV and external standards and requirements. The role also leads regional capacity strengthening, including Regional/ National Disaster Management Team (RDMT/NDMT) coordination, development and delivery, mentoring, learning and surge/deployment systems, so field and regional teams can make informed decisions and deliver fast, effective, and accountable humanitarian action.</p><p>KEY RESPONSIBILITIES:</p><p>Response Programme Management</p><ul><li>Provide in-country or remote leadership and technical support to Humanitarian response teams as requested by the Regional Impact Director or Senior Director of Operations.</li><li>Lead or support emergency response set up, scale up, coordination and/or transition, ensuring responses are timely, context-relevant, risk-informed and aligned with external and WVs standards and requirements.</li><li>Support and, where delegated, lead emergency declaration processes, alert drafting/review, response coordination mechanisms and response planning.</li><li>Lead or contribute to development of humanitarian response plans, scenario, or contingency plans, among other processes.</li><li>Remain available for deployment to crises situations in a country or region within 24 to 72 hours and (worst case scenario) be prepared to support for up to 12 weeks (remote and/or in country).</li></ul><p>Direct Field support</p><ul><li>Ensure that the leadership of selected countries have adequately considered humanitarian issues (including preparedness, response capacity, early action and scenario and risk analysis) into their strategies, structures, and programming.</li><li>Support Field Offices SLTs and HEA focal points to review and strengthen disaster management systems, preparedness action plans, response readiness and capacity improvement plans, using relevant regional and global metrics such as the Disaster Management (DM) Preparedness Scorecard or Maturity Framework.</li><li>Provide technical input into humanitarian project design and grant proposals, ensuring proposals are context-relevant, feasible, risk-informed and aligned with World Vision (WV) and external humanitarian standards.</li><li>Field Offices with scenario planning, disaster risk reduction, anticipatory action, early action, CBDRM and other preparedness approaches according to country and regional needs.</li><li>Review Field Office humanitarian communications, positioning materials and response updates from an HEA perspective, supporting technical accuracy, and alignment with response priorities.</li><li>Advise Field Office leadership on humanitarian issues as requested.</li></ul><p>Capacity Building &amp; Surge</p><ul><li>Lead the design, development and delivery of regional disaster management capacity strengthening initiatives, including the Regional Disaster Management Team and National Disaster Management Team training, refreshers, mentoring, ToT and learning processes.</li><li>Work with the RDMT leaders of other regions to gather best practice and opportunities to improve MEERs RDMT and enable inter regional deployments.</li><li>Manage and strengthen the MEER deployment roster and related surge systems so that timely and capable humanitarian surge support can be mobilized as needed.</li><li>Mentor national, regional program staff, supporting practical application of external humanitarian standards and internal standards and awareness through on-the-job learning.</li><li>Liaise with Global Centre (GC) DM Surge functions to influence their development, coordinate deployments and maximize their value for MEER.</li><li>Lead on development and implementation of DM related capacity building and surge capacity strategies and plans in consultation with the Impact Director and other key RO functions</li></ul><p>Quality Assurance and Policy Alignment</p><ul><li>Provide technical support to ensure Regional HEA engagement with SMQ systems and procedures such as AIM, IMPAQ, Response Portal, etc.</li><li>Develop, adapt, and promote practical tools, templates, and guidance , ensuring learning from other regions and disaster management practitioners.</li><li>Build mechanisms for gathering, analysing, and sharing lessons-learned, after-action review findings, best practice and innovation across the region and the wider partnership.</li><li>Ensure that relevant WVI DM policy, SPHERE, CHS, the Red Cross Code of Conduct, HAP, Child Protection policies and other international humanitarian standards are used in all design and management of responses and disaster mitigation activities.</li><li>Engage and stay involved in International Humanitarian Aid and International Humanitarian Rights standards and initiatives.</li></ul><p>Analysis and information provision</p><ul><li><br></li></ul></div></section><section><p class="heading">Desired Candidate Profile</p><p class="paragraph"></p><ul><li>A University degree in the social sciences, international relations management, or other relevant areas.</li><li>On the job training in emergency response, humanitarian operations management, humanitarian project design, risk management and disaster risk reduction</li><li>At least 5 years of humanitarian experience, including leading teams working in emergency settings.</li><li>Experience leading, coordinating or supporting humanitarian responses in complex, fragile or rapidly changing contexts.</li><li>Coaching ability</li><li>Disaster risk reduction knowledge</li><li>Strong understanding of emergency relief management, program response, program design, project proposal development and budgeting.</li><li>Experience providing technical support to country teams, including support to humanitarian strategy, response planning, project design, grant proposals and/or capacity strengthening.</li><li>Experience in advising and influencing global technical teams, regional leadership, and national leadership to forward a technical agenda in a complex matrix organization.</li><li>Experience in coordinating/managing field operations and implementing external humanitarian standards, including Sphere, CHS, protection, safeguarding, conflict sensitivity and accountability standards.</li><li>Experience managing or coordinating surge support, deployments, rosters, mentoring or capacity building initiatives.</li><li>Strong analytical skills, including the ability to assess humanitarian risks, track response progress, identify gaps and translate complex information into clear recommendations for decision makers.</li><li>Cross cultural experience and proven ability to work effectively on short term deployments and with diverse and multi-disciplinary teams.</li><li>Demonstrated commitment to WV s vision, mission, and core values.</li><li>Ability to exhibit exemplary lifestyle as interpreted in specific local cultural contexts, with an open world view.</li><li>Responsible steward of resources and assets.</li><li>A self-starter with a proven ability to work independently and meet deadlines under pressure.</li><li>Ability to promote a team building environment and understands and values diversity and maximizes diversity to achieve organizational goals.</li><li>High level of cultural sensitivity and diplomatic skills, and a demonstrated ability to manage cross-cultural dynamics.</li><li>Emotional maturity, and physical stamina.</li><li>Is able to promote a healthy work environment for self and others whereby a balance is maintained between work and recreation/family.</li><li>Ability to maintain performance expectations in diverse cultural contexts, psychologically stressful environs, time pressure and physical hardships.</li><li>High degree of negotiation and persuasion skills.</li><li>A team builder committed to capacity building and the transfer of knowledge.</li><li>Mature Christian with commitment to World Vision Core Values and Mission Statement.</li><li>Fluency in spoken and written English</li><li>Must be able and willing and to travel up to 40% of time including long-term deployment of up to 3 months to a crisis situation.</li><li>Ability to adjust to harsh living conditions and work in high tension and high security situations.</li><li>Experience working in the MEER region or in contexts affected by conflict, displacement, rapid-onset disasters, or protracted crises.</li><li>Experience in anticipatory action, early warning, scenario planning, CBDRM, cash programming, or localisation approaches.</li><li>Experience developing practical tools, guidance, learning resources or capacity strengthening materials for country teams.</li></ul><p></p></section>

<h2 class="h5">Job description</h2> <div class="t-break" data-jb-field="description"> Result of Service<br>Ultimate Results of Service and Delivery Dates • Inception Report: The evaluator will submit a draft Inception Report totalling not more than 10 pages, in addition to associated annexes. The Inception Report will summarize the desk review and propose the evaluation methodology and sampling strategy/ies to be used in the evaluation, along with a detailed workplan, draft evaluation matrix, stakeholder matrix, and quality assurance mechanism. Any revisions to the Inception Report will be implemented no later than one week following receipt of comments. o The Inception Report shall, where relevant, address the integration of human rights, disability inclusion, gender equality, and environmental issues. The Inception Report should contain ideas for further exploration to support organisational learning, to be done either as part of this evaluation or separately by ESCWA itself. • Debriefing Meeting: Following the completion of the data collection and field mission phase, and prior to the delivery of the draft evaluation report, the evaluator should hold a debriefing meeting for the presentation of the preliminary findings to the project team. • Draft Evaluation Report: Following data collection and the analysis of findings, the evaluator will submit a Draft Evaluation Report. The Draft Evaluation Report will be user-friendly, well-structured and evidence-based, totalling not more than 40 pages, in addition to a 2-page Executive Summary and associated annexes. • The Draft Evaluation Report will summarize the agreed-upon methodology listed in the Inception Report, describe the evaluation’s data collection and analytical approach, and present findings. In addition, the evaluator should develop clear action-oriented recommendations, which are forward-looking and will enable ESCWA to leverage and capitalize on innovative practices emerging from the Reform. o The Draft Evaluation Report will be reviewed by ESCWA’s SPARK Section, and the programme team, before being discussed with the evaluator. • Final Evaluation Report: The Final Evaluation Report that should incorporate the comments and feedback from the Evaluation Manager and the programme team, is expected. The Final Evaluation Report shall, where relevant, address the integration of human rights, disability inclusion, gender equality, and environmental issues. o The Final Evaluation Report shall contain information (data, findings, expert views) that may allow ESCWA to identify lessons for wider organisational learning or for potential changes to relevant organisational policies, irrespective of the extent to which the evaluation recommendations make reference to such information.<br> Work Location<br>Remote<br> Expected duration<br>5 Months<br> Duties and Responsibilities<br>Background Subprogramme 4 Statistics, the information society and technology (subprogramme 4) aims to strengthen official statistical systems and advance the information society in the Arab region by improving the quality, availability and use of data, while accelerating the integration of technology and innovation for sustainable development. It focuses on enhancing national statistical capacities to adopt international standards and innovative data sources; supporting evidence based policymaking through improved production and use of statistics, including gender and disability data; and guiding digital transformation through policy advice on emerging technologies. The subprogramme also promotes regional dialogue and partnerships among governments, experts, civil society and the private sector to maximize the value of statistics, geospatial data, digitization and new technologies in support of the 2030 Agenda. Duties and Responsibilities Purpose of the Evaluation Evaluations at ESCWA strive to demonstrate the difference that is being made by the work of ESCWA, and its impact on member States and their citizens. This evaluation will aim to determine the extent to which subprogramme 4 is achieving its intended results, the pathway to these results, and the elements that contribute most significantly to the achievement of these results. In addition, it will also consider how the project brings about any unintended results that may have occurred. The evaluation will serve three main purposes: • It will provide a basis for evidence-informed decision-making, strategic planning, and risk management. • It is a means to demonstrate accountability to the organization’s Executive Management and member States for performance, relative to ESCWA’s mandate and strategic objectives. • It will inform and facilitate organizational learning by identifying evidence-based findings, lessons to be learned, and recommendations for action that enhance the next generation of ESCWA’s work. The evaluation will therefore take both a summative and a formative approach. It will look at results achieved or not achieved so far (summative) with a view to inform ESCWA’s work in the future (formative). The evaluation will be conducted in line with ESCWA’s Evaluation Policy (2025), and the UNEG Norms and Standards for Evaluation.. The evaluation will strive to employ development best practices with regard to promoting gender equality and a human rights-based approach, including the rights of persons with disabilities. The evaluation will be facilitated and coordinated by ESCWA’s Strategic Planning, Accountability, Results and Knowledge team. Scope of the Evaluation The evaluation will be forward-looking and will objectively and systematically assess the performance of the subprogramme in terms of its relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, and sustainability. Furthermore, the evaluation will assess the extent to which gender, human rights, disability inclusion, environmental concerns, and other cross-cutting issues were incorporated or mainstreamed into the subprogramme. The evaluation will cover the period from January 2020 to December 2025. Areas of focus for each sub-programme evaluation include: • Key aspects of UN and ESCWA reforms, including the merger of the Statistics Division and the Technology for Development Division into one Cluster, as relevant; • The overall coherence of the subprogramme’s work and the extent to which its work has been synergetic; • The relevant IT- and AI-enabled tools/systems/platforms developed by the subprogramme; • Organisation-wide policies, as relevant, to promote organisational learning. Evaluation Criteria The following key evaluation questions per criteria will guide the evaluation. The evaluator/s is expected to refine evaluation questions where necessary and to include the refinement in the Inception Report. Relevance • To what extent are the objectives and expected accomplishments of the subprogramme aligned with: o ESCWA's strategic framework and programme budget? o Regional development priorities and challenges? o The 2030 Agenda and relevant SDGs? • To what extent do the subprogramme's interventions respond to the evolving needs and priorities of member States? • How well do the subprogramme's products and services (research, policy advice, capacity-building, convening) address identified gaps and demands? • To what extent are the needs and priorities of vulnerable or marginalized population groups reflected in the subprogramme's design and implementation? • How relevant are the subprogramme's thematic areas and approaches in the current regional context? • To what extent has the subprogramme adapted to emerging regional challenges and opportunities? Coherence • To what extent did the merger of the Statistics and Technology divisions create positive synergies, or did it result in parallel, siloed work streams? • How well does the subprogramme align its data and technology initiatives with the interventions of UN Country Teams and the League of Arab States to avoid duplication? • How well does subprogramme 4 align its scope and collaborate with other teams in ESCWA to avoid duplication and improve efficiency? For example with DSDSD. • Are there opportunities for greater coordination, collaboration, or integration with other subprogrammes within ESCWA and other institutions? Effectiveness • To what extent have the planned outputs and activities been delivered as intended? • To what extent have the expected accomplishments/outcomes been achieved? • How effectively has the subprogramme contributed to strengthening the capacities of member States and other stakeholders? • To what extent have knowledge products and policy recommendations been utilized by target stakeholders? • What factors facilitated or hindered the achievement of results? • How effectively has the subprogramme integrated cross-cutting issues such as gender equality, human rights, disability inclusion, youth, and environmental sustainability? • How could other factors have contributed to the achievement of the identified results? • How were key partnerships integrated in the delivery of the programme to maximise the achievement of results? Efficiency • To what extent were financial, human, and technical resources used efficiently to produce outputs and outcomes? • To what extent were management arrangements conducive to efficient implementation? • How cost-effective were the different types of interventions (e.g., research, policy advisory services, capacity-building, regional forums)? • To what extent did coordination within ESCWA and with external partners reduce duplication and generate synergies? • Were monitoring, reporting, and learning mechanisms adequate to support adaptive management and efficient implementation? • Could similar results have been achieved with fewer resources or through alternative approaches? Impact • What, if any, high-level effects did the programme cause (such as changes in norms or systems)? • To what extent has the subprogramme influenced policies, legislation, strategies, institutions, or practices in member States? • To what extent has the subprogramme contributed to regional cooperation, knowledge exchange, and policy dialogue? • To what extent did the intervention lead to other changes, including “scalable” or “replicable” results? • While long-term transformative impact may be difficult to measure, what 'early signals' of impact – such as specific policy adoption, changes to statistical regulations, or behavioral shifts – can be directly traced to the subprogramme's interventions? Sustainability • Have capacities, systems, and institutional arrangements been strengthened sufficiently to maintain benefits? • To what extent have knowledge products, tools, methodologies, and networks continued to be used after their initial delivery? • What risks could affect the sustainability of the results, and how have they been addressed? • Did the subprogramme successfully establish formal 'institutional homes' (e.g., permanent national observatories, explicit operational manuals, or formal focal points) within Member State governments to ensure tools and data platforms survive beyond ESCWA's direct involvement? • To what extent has the subprogramme fostered partnerships and mechanisms that can support continued implementation and scaling up? • What evidence is available to indicate that the results of the programme can be maintained by stakeholders? Gender, Human Rights, Disability Inclusion, and Environmental Issues • To what extent were issues of gender, human rights, disability inclusion, and the environment incorporated into the design, planning, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation practices of the programme, as well as the results achieved? • To what extent did the programme respond to and affect the rights, needs and interests of different stakeholders, including women, men, youth, people with disabilities and other marginalized groups? Evaluation Methodology Management and Governance Arrangements All evaluation methodologies are to be reviewed by ESCWA’s SPARK Section and approved by ESCWA’s Senior Management. • The evaluation will be conducted by an external consultant/s. • The evaluator is expected to identify the main objectives achieved through the implementation of the programme, intended and unintended, as established by key stakeholders and relevant documentation, and the pathways that led to achieving them, with particular focus on innovative practices and initiatives that can be leveraged to further enhance ESCWA’s work. • The evaluator is expected to ensure a mixed method (qualitative and quantitative), inclusive, and participatory approach, with adequate triangulation across methods, to arrive at credible, reliable, and unbiased findings. • The evaluator will also ensure that all aspects of the evaluation are gender and human rights sensitive (including a special focus on the rights with person with disabilities). In addition, the evaluator must ensure that he/she always complies with the UNEG Ethical Guidelines for Evaluation during the conduct of the evaluation. The above methodology is indicative. The evaluator is expected to build upon it and present a robust evaluation methodology within the inception report, including addressing and refining the evaluation questions. Quality Assurance Mechanism The evaluator will employ a quality assurance mechanism of her/his preference (either an internal or an external system can be used), which will provide quality checks throughout the evaluation process. This quality assurance mechanism will be indicated in the Inception Report and in the Final Evaluation Report. In addition, ESCWA will review the evaluation report prior to finalization to ensure that it aligns with the UNEG Quality Checklist for Evaluation Reports , particularly with reference to the quality of recommendations. Evaluation Ethics The evaluation will be conducted in accordance with the principles outlined in the UNEG Ethical Guidelines for Evaluation; and all rights and confidentiality of information providers will be prioritized and safeguarded as per UNEG Ethical Guidelines for Evaluation.<br> Qualifications/special skills<br>A Master's degree in management, evaluation, or related area is required. All candidates must submit a copy of the required educational degree. Incomplete applications will not be reviewed. Minimum of 5 years of experience conducting assessments, reviews or evaluations of projects, programmes or policies in the UN or international context is required. A high level of knowledge in the distilling, communication and reporting of findings, forward-looking recommendations, best practices, and lessons learned is required. Excellent oral and written communication skills and the ability to effectively convey complex information in a clear and concise manner to both governmental and UN audiences is required. Work experience in STATISTICS and/or THE INFORMATION SOCIETY AND TECHNOLOGY issues is desirable.<br> Languages<br>English and French are the working languages of the United Nations Secretariat; and Arabic is a working language of ESCWA. For this position, fluency in English is required. Fluency in Arabic is desirable. Note: “Fluency” equals a rating of ‘fluent’ in all four areas (speak, read, write, and understand) and “Knowledge of” equals a rating of ‘confident’ in two of the four areas.<br> Additional Information<br>Not available.<br> No Fee<br>THE UNITED NATIONS DOES NOT CHARGE A FEE AT ANY STAGE OF THE RECRUITMENT PROCESS (APPLICATION, INTERVIEW MEETING, PROCESSING, OR TRAINING). THE UNITED NATIONS DOES NOT CONCERN ITSELF WITH INFORMATION ON APPLICANTS’ BANK ACCOUNTS.<br><br><br> </div>